Empowering Commonsense Wildfire Prevention and Response

6/12/2025

Executive Orders

View Original

Action Summary

Purpose: Address deficiencies in wildfire response highlighted by the January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires, emphasizing mismanagement, lack of preparedness, outdated technology, and bureaucratic delays that endanger communities across regions.
Streamlining Federal Governance: Within 90 days, the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture are directed to consolidate wildland fire programs—integrating offices, budgets, procurement, and research—to maximize efficient federal support.
Enhancing Local Preparedness and Response:
- Within 90 days, strengthen partnerships, compacts, and mutual aid among federal, state, local, tribal, and community-led initiatives to reduce wildfire risk.
- Within 180 days, develop a comprehensive technology roadmap—in consultation with OSTP and other agencies—to implement AI, data sharing, mapping, and risk management strategies for improved wildfire detection and response.
Strengthening Wildfire Mitigation:
- Within 90 days, direct the EPA and Agriculture to review and modify federal rules impeding prescribed fires and the use of fire retardant.
- Encourage innovative use of woody biomass to reduce fuel loads and initiate rulemaking for safer bulk-power system practices without increasing costs.
- Review pending litigation involving utilities to ensure resolutions advance wildfire prevention efforts.
Modernizing Wildfire Prevention and Response:
- Within 120 days, declassify and release historical satellite data to improve wildfire prediction and modeling.
- Within 180 days, identify and eliminate regulatory barriers to effective wildfire management and develop performance metrics for response readiness.
- Within 210 days, assess the sale of excess defense assets to support wildfire mitigation efforts.
General Provisions:
- Ensure no impairment of existing departmental authority or OMB functions.
- Implement measures in accordance with law and appropriations, with shared publication costs between the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior.

Risks & Considerations

The Executive Order focuses on improving wildfire prevention and response, which may not directly impact Vanderbilt University. However, the emphasis on technology and data sharing could present opportunities for research and collaboration in areas such as artificial intelligence, data modeling, and environmental science.
There is a potential risk that changes in federal rules and policies regarding land management and wildfire prevention could indirectly affect research funding and priorities, particularly for departments involved in environmental studies and public policy.
The order’s focus on streamlining federal wildfire capabilities and promoting local strategies may lead to shifts in federal funding allocations, which could impact grants and research opportunities for institutions like Vanderbilt.
Vanderbilt may need to consider how these changes in federal policies could affect its partnerships with government agencies and other institutions involved in environmental research and land management.

Impacted Programs

Vanderbilt’s School of Engineering could benefit from increased demand for research and development in technology-enabled wildfire prevention and response strategies, particularly in areas such as AI and data analytics.
The Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences may find new opportunities for collaboration with federal agencies and other institutions focused on land management and environmental protection.
Vanderbilt’s Public Policy Studies Program might engage in policy analysis and development related to the implementation of the Executive Order and its impact on local and federal land management strategies.
The Office of Research could explore new funding opportunities and partnerships related to the technological and policy aspects of wildfire prevention and response.

Financial Impact

The reallocation of federal resources towards wildfire prevention and response initiatives could impact the funding landscape for environmental research, potentially leading to new grant opportunities for Vanderbilt.
Vanderbilt University might experience changes in its research funding opportunities, particularly if federal discretionary grants prioritize technology and data-driven solutions for wildfire management.
There may be increased opportunities for Vanderbilt to secure funding for research and development in environmental policy and technology, particularly through collaborations with the Department of the Interior and other federal agencies.
As federal policies shift towards more efficient wildfire management, there could be a shift in the focus of environmental research and education programs at Vanderbilt, potentially affecting curriculum and research priorities.

Relevance Score: 3 (The order presents moderate risks and opportunities, particularly in research and collaboration areas related to technology and environmental policy.)

Key Actions

Vanderbilt’s Environmental Science Department should explore research opportunities related to wildfire prevention and response technologies. By leveraging expertise in AI and data analytics, the department can contribute to the development of innovative solutions for wildfire management, potentially securing federal research grants.
The Office of Federal Relations should monitor developments in federal wildfire governance and preparedness policies. Engaging with federal agencies to understand new regulations and funding opportunities can position Vanderbilt to influence policy and secure resources for related research initiatives.
Vanderbilt’s School of Engineering could collaborate with federal agencies to develop and test new engineering approaches for wildfire prevention and response. This collaboration could enhance the university’s reputation in environmental engineering and lead to new partnerships and funding opportunities.
The Vanderbilt Institute for Energy and Environment should assess the implications of new federal policies on vegetation management and forest-hazardous fuel removal. By aligning research and outreach efforts with these policies, the institute can contribute to national efforts in reducing wildfire risks.
Vanderbilt’s Law School should consider offering courses or seminars on the legal aspects of wildfire management and litigation. This could provide students with valuable insights into the intersection of environmental law and policy, preparing them for careers in this evolving field.

Opportunities

The executive order presents an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Environmental Science Department to expand its research on wildfire prevention and response. By collaborating with federal agencies and leveraging AI and data analytics, the department can contribute to innovative solutions and secure federal research grants.
Vanderbilt can capitalize on the increased focus on wildfire management by developing new programs and partnerships with federal agencies and other research institutions. This could include joint research initiatives, technology development, and collaborative policy analysis, enhancing Vanderbilt’s reputation and reach in environmental science and policy.
The emphasis on technology-enabled wildfire response offers an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s School of Engineering to engage in research and development of new engineering approaches. By collaborating with federal agencies, the school can enhance its reputation in environmental engineering and secure new partnerships and funding opportunities.
The order’s focus on reducing wildfire risks through vegetation management and forest-hazardous fuel removal aligns with Vanderbilt’s commitment to environmental sustainability. The university can develop targeted outreach and support programs for communities at risk of wildfires, enhancing their resilience and safety.
By engaging with the broader environmental community and policymakers, Vanderbilt can position itself as a leader in the national conversation on wildfire management. Hosting conferences, workshops, and public forums on the implications of wildfire policies can further establish Vanderbilt as a hub for innovative environmental thought and practice.

Relevance Score: 4 (The order presents the potential for major process changes required for Vanderbilt’s programs due to opportunities in research and collaboration with federal agencies.)

Average Relevance Score: 3.6

Timeline for Implementation

Within 90 days (Section 2: Consolidation of wildland fire programs; Section 3(a): Expansion of partnerships and measures; Section 4: Considerations to modify or rescind certain Federal rules or policies.)
Within 180 days (Section 3(b): Development of a comprehensive technology roadmap; Section 5(b): Identification and revision of rules, plus development of performance metrics.)
Within 120 days (Section 5(a): Identification, declassification, and public release of historical satellite datasets.)
Within 210 days (Section 5(c): Evaluation and prioritization of the sale of excess aircraft and aircraft parts for wildfire mitigation and response.)

Relevance Score: 2

Impacted Government Organizations

Department of the Interior: Directed to consolidate wildland fire programs and coordinate wildfire prevention and response measures.
Department of Agriculture: Tasked with streamlining wildfire governance, incentivizing local preparedness, and collaborating on wildfire mitigation measures.
Department of Homeland Security: Consulted to expand partnerships and mutual aid capabilities for improved local wildfire response.
Department of Commerce: Engaged in consultations to develop technology roadmaps and revise rules impeding wildfire preparedness.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Instructed to review and possibly modify Federal rules or policies that hinder the use of prescribed fires and fire retardants.
Department of Energy: Along with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, considered for rulemaking on best practices to reduce wildfire ignition risks from the bulk-power system.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC): Involved in evaluating and potentially establishing new rules to mitigate wildfire risks arising from the bulk-power system.
Department of Justice (Attorney General): Required to review litigation involving electrical utilities to ensure alignment with wildfire prevention and mitigation efforts.
Department of Defense: Directed to leverage satellite data, declassify historical datasets, and explore the sale of excess aircraft to support wildfire mitigation and response.
Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP): Consulted for developing a comprehensive technology roadmap to enhance wildfire prediction and response capabilities.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB): Its functions related to budgetary and administrative proposals remain unaffected but are acknowledged in the order’s general provisions.
National Interagency Fire Center: Represented by agency heads who are involved in coordinating interagency wildfire response and performance metric development.

Relevance Score: 4 (Between 11 and 15 agencies are directly impacted by this presidential action.)

Responsible Officials

Secretary of the Interior – Tasked with consolidating and coordinating wildland fire programs, consulting on local preparedness, and initiating rulemaking for wildfire mitigation.
Secretary of Agriculture – Responsible alongside the Secretary of the Interior for consolidating wildland fire programs, incentivizing state and local wildfire prevention measures, and facilitating innovative fuel reduction practices.
Secretary of Homeland Security – Consulted for expanding partnerships and agreements to improve local and state wildfire preparedness.
Secretary of Commerce – Consulted to assist in developing comprehensive technology roadmaps and reviewing rules that impede wildfire response.
Heads of agencies represented at the National Interagency Fire Center – Involved in developing rules and performance metrics aimed at improving wildfire prevention and response.
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency – Directed to consider modifying or rescinding federal rules that hinder the use of prescribed fires and fire retardants.
Secretary of Energy – Consulted, along with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, to consider rulemaking on reducing wildfire ignition risks from the bulk-power system.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission – Partnered in initiating rulemaking proceedings to establish best practices for wildfire risk mitigation.
Attorney General – Tasked with reviewing pending and proposed wildfire-related litigation, in consultation with the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior.
Secretary of Defense – Responsible for identifying, declassifying, and disseminating historical satellite datasets to aid in wildfire prevention and response, and evaluating the sale of excess aircraft/parts for wildfire mitigation.
Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) – Consulted by both the Secretary of Defense and others to develop technological innovations and comprehensive roadmaps to enhance wildfire response capabilities.
Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs – Consulted with the Secretary of Defense regarding the declassification and public release of historical satellite datasets.

Relevance Score: 5 (The directives impact multiple Cabinet-level officials and agency heads, indicating national strategic significance).