President Trump’s Peace Through Strength Is Correcting Course, Driving Results

April 1, 2025

Articles

View Original

Action Summary

Strategic Shift: Implementation of “Peace through Strength” to restore domestic safety and international security after previous foreign policy setbacks.
Enhanced Border Security: Mobilization of 10,000 troops from Mexico at the southern border and 10,000 personnel from Canada at the northern border to combat illegal immigration and illicit fentanyl trafficking.
Designation of Terrorist Organizations: Classifying deadly drug cartels and transnational gangs as Foreign Terrorist Organizations, empowering law enforcement to arrest and deport violent criminals.
International Cooperation on Repatriation: Pressure on Colombia, Venezuela, and other countries to accept repatriation flights for their citizens illegally residing in the U.S.
Border Crossing Reductions: Achieving a historic 95% decrease in illegal border crossings over the previous year.
Counterterrorism Initiatives: Sharing critical intelligence leading to the arrest and extradition of an ISIS terrorist responsible for the Abbey Gate bombing and eliminating multiple terrorist threats, including a high-ranking ISIS planner in Somalia.
Pressure on Foreign Adversaries: Reimposing maximum pressure on the Iranian regime regarding its nuclear ambitions and terrorist support, and conducting strikes against over 200 Houthi targets to degrade their operational capabilities.
Geopolitical Maneuvers: Influencing Panama to exit China’s Belt and Road Initiative, countering Chinese influence in the Western Hemisphere.
Diplomatic Achievements: Securing the release of 39 U.S. citizens detained abroad and brokering a temporary ceasefire in Gaza to facilitate hostage release, including an American citizen.
Engagement with Ukraine and Russia: Bringing both nations to the negotiating table for discussions aimed at a peaceful resolution, marking the first such engagement in three years.

Risks & Considerations

The designation of drug cartels and transnational gangs as Foreign Terrorist Organizations could lead to increased scrutiny and regulatory changes affecting international students and faculty, particularly those from regions impacted by these designations.
Heightened border security and immigration enforcement may affect Vanderbilt’s international student population, potentially leading to decreased enrollment and diversity, which could impact the university’s cultural and academic environment.
Increased counterterrorism activities and foreign policy shifts may influence research funding and collaborations, particularly in areas related to international relations, security studies, and global policy.
Vanderbilt may need to reassess its partnerships and collaborations with institutions in countries affected by U.S. foreign policy changes, such as those in the Middle East and Latin America, to ensure compliance with new regulations and maintain academic integrity.

Impacted Programs

Vanderbilt’s International Student and Scholar Services may need to enhance support services for international students affected by changes in immigration policies and border security measures.
The Department of Political Science and Center for Latin American Studies could see increased demand for expertise and research on the implications of U.S. foreign policy and its impact on international relations.
Vanderbilt Law School may need to provide additional resources and guidance on immigration law and policy changes to students and faculty.
The Office of Global Safety and Security might need to update travel advisories and risk assessments for students and faculty traveling to regions affected by U.S. foreign policy actions.

Financial Impact

Changes in immigration policies and border security could impact the university’s revenue from international student tuition, necessitating adjustments in financial planning and recruitment strategies.
Vanderbilt may experience shifts in research funding opportunities, particularly in areas related to international security, counterterrorism, and foreign policy, which could affect grant application strategies and partnerships.
There may be increased opportunities for Vanderbilt to secure funding for research and development in international relations and security studies, particularly through collaborations with federal agencies and think tanks.
The university might need to allocate additional resources to support services for international students and faculty affected by changes in immigration policies and border security measures.

Relevance Score: 4 (The executive actions present a need for potential major changes or transformations of programs and policies.)

Key Actions

Vanderbilt’s Center for Latin American Studies should analyze the impact of increased border security and repatriation policies on Latin American countries. This research can provide insights into regional stability and migration patterns, which are crucial for understanding the broader implications of U.S. foreign policy.
The Department of Political Science should conduct studies on the designation of drug cartels and gangs as Foreign Terrorist Organizations. This research can explore the legal and social ramifications of such designations and contribute to policy discussions on national and international security.
Vanderbilt’s Law School should explore the legal implications of the U.S. counterterrorism activities and the designation of foreign entities as terrorist organizations. This could include examining the impact on international law and human rights.
The Office of Federal Relations should monitor developments in U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding Iran and the Middle East, to assess potential impacts on international students and faculty from these regions. This will help in providing necessary support and resources.
Vanderbilt’s Peabody College could explore educational initiatives focused on peace and conflict resolution, leveraging the recent negotiations between Ukraine and Russia as case studies for academic programs.

Opportunities

The focus on counterterrorism and international security presents an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Institute for Global Security to expand its research and partnerships with government agencies. This could enhance the university’s role in shaping security policies and practices.
Vanderbilt can capitalize on the increased emphasis on border security by developing programs and research initiatives that address the socio-economic impacts of immigration policies. This could include collaborations with international universities and organizations.
The university can engage in public forums and discussions on the implications of the U.S. exiting China’s Belt and Road Initiative, positioning itself as a thought leader in global economic policy and international relations.

Relevance Score: 3 (Some adjustments are needed to processes or procedures to align with the evolving foreign policy landscape.)

Average Relevance Score: 3.2

Timeline for Implementation

N/A – The summary describes a series of actions and accomplishments without specifying any future deadlines or implementation schedules.

Relevance Score: 1

Impacted Government Organizations

Department of Homeland Security (DHS): Responsible for overseeing U.S. border security and immigration enforcement, which are central to the initiatives outlined in the text.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP): A key sub-agency under DHS tasked with managing border security, particularly as the text highlights historic reductions in illegal crossings.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): Involved in enforcing immigration laws and handling the deportation of individuals, aligning with the repatriation and border control measures discussed.
Department of State: Plays a critical role in the diplomatic aspects of the initiatives (e.g., repatriation flights, ceasefire negotiations, and multi-national engagements with countries like Pakistan, Panama, Ukraine, and Russia).
Department of Defense (DoD): Engages in counterterrorism operations, military strikes, and enforcing pressure on foreign adversaries as described in the text.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI): Integral to domestic law enforcement and counterterrorism efforts, particularly in relation to the designation of certain criminal organizations as foreign terrorist entities.
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA): Supports the intelligence-sharing and counterterrorism efforts that underpin several of the text’s highlighted actions.

Relevance Score: 3 (6-10 agencies are impacted by the directives outlined in the text.)

Responsible Officials

President Donald J. Trump – As the chief executive, he issued the directives and orders that underpinned the various actions described in the text.

Relevance Score: 5 (The directives stem directly from the President, a top official whose orders set the course for broad executive and foreign policy actions.)