Ending Illegal Discrimination And Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity

January 21, 2025

Presidential Actions

View Original

Action Summary

Purpose: Enforce longstanding Federal civil‐rights laws by ending illegal race- and sex-based preferences under DEI/DEIA, thereby restoring merit-based opportunity and national unity.
Policy Directive: Instructs all executive departments and agencies to terminate discriminatory policies, mandates, and practices that violate civil‐rights laws, emphasizing individual initiative, excellence, and hard work.
Federal Government Actions:
- Revokes previous executive orders and memoranda related to DEI, including EOs 12898, 13583, 13672 and the 2016 memorandum.
- Revises the federal contracting process to remove requirements for diversity initiatives and affirmative action, mandating compliance with anti-discrimination laws.
- Directs the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to eliminate DEI terminology from acquisition, contracting, grants, and financial assistance procedures.
Private Sector Encouragement: Calls for agency actions to promote merit-based practices in the private sector and requires the Attorney General to submit a report with strategic recommendations and potential compliance investigations.
Educational Guidance: Mandates that the Attorney General and Secretary of Education issue guidance to educational agencies and institutions regarding compliance with the Students for Fair Admissions decision.
Additional Provisions:
- Includes severability provisions ensuring that if one part is invalidated, the rest remains effective.
- Specifies exclusions for lawful preferences for veterans and protections related to First Amendment speech.
- Clarifies that the order does not create any enforceable rights against the Federal Government.

Risks & Considerations

The Executive Order’s emphasis on ending DEI and DEIA policies could significantly impact Vanderbilt University’s diversity and inclusion initiatives. This may lead to a reevaluation of current programs and policies to ensure compliance with federal mandates.
There is a risk that the revocation of previous executive orders promoting diversity and inclusion could lead to decreased support for minority groups within the university, potentially affecting campus culture and student satisfaction.
The order’s focus on merit-based opportunities may require changes in admissions and hiring practices, potentially impacting the university’s efforts to maintain a diverse student body and faculty.
Vanderbilt University may face increased scrutiny and potential investigations if its DEI programs are perceived as non-compliant with the new federal guidelines, particularly given its substantial endowment.

Impacted Programs

Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion at Vanderbilt may need to reassess its strategies and initiatives to align with the new federal policies, potentially leading to restructuring or reallocation of resources.
Admissions Office might need to revise its criteria and processes to ensure that they are merit-based and do not inadvertently violate the new executive order.
The Human Resources Department could be required to update hiring practices and training programs to focus more on individual merit and less on diversity metrics.
Vanderbilt’s partnerships with organizations and institutions that prioritize DEI initiatives may need to be reevaluated to ensure compliance with federal regulations.

Financial Impact

The potential reduction in federal funding for DEI-related programs could impact Vanderbilt’s budget allocations, necessitating adjustments in funding strategies and priorities.
There may be a need for increased legal and compliance resources to navigate the complexities of the new regulations and avoid potential penalties or litigation.
Changes in federal grant and contract requirements could affect Vanderbilt’s research funding, particularly if DEI considerations are no longer prioritized in grant applications.
The university might experience shifts in donor contributions if alumni and supporters perceive the changes as misaligned with their values regarding diversity and inclusion.

Relevance Score: 5 (The order presents critical risks involving legal or regulatory issues that could necessitate significant changes in university policies and practices.)

Key Actions

Vanderbilt University’s Office of Federal Relations should closely monitor the implementation of this executive order, particularly the revocation of previous executive orders related to diversity and inclusion. Understanding the changes in federal policies will be crucial for ensuring compliance and adapting university policies accordingly.
Vanderbilt’s Human Resources Department should review and potentially revise hiring and employment practices to ensure they align with the new federal guidelines that emphasize merit-based opportunity and compliance with civil-rights laws.
The Office of the General Counsel should assess the legal implications of the order, especially concerning the university’s DEI initiatives, to ensure that they do not conflict with federal anti-discrimination laws.
Vanderbilt’s Financial Aid Office should prepare for potential changes in federal funding and grant requirements, as the order may impact how federal funds are allocated to institutions of higher education.
The Department of Political Science should consider conducting research on the broader societal impacts of the shift away from DEI policies, providing insights that could inform university strategy and public discourse.

Opportunities

The executive order presents an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Peabody College to lead research on the effectiveness of merit-based policies in education and employment, potentially influencing future policy development.
Vanderbilt can position itself as a thought leader by hosting forums and discussions on the implications of the executive order, engaging with policymakers, academics, and the public to explore the balance between diversity initiatives and merit-based opportunities.
The emphasis on compliance with civil-rights laws offers an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Law School to engage in policy analysis and advocacy, providing expertise on how institutions can navigate the changing legal landscape.

Relevance Score: 4 (The order necessitates major process changes for Vanderbilt’s programs due to its impact on diversity and inclusion policies.)

Average Relevance Score: 4.2

Timeline for Implementation

90 days – Federal contractors must transition from the current regulatory scheme within 90 days from the date of the order.
120 days – The Attorney General is to submit a report on enforcing civil-rights laws, and the Attorney General with the Secretary of Education must issue guidance to State and local educational agencies within 120 days.

The shortest timeline mentioned is 90 days, which places the directives in the 90-179 day compliance range.

Relevance Score: 2

Impacted Government Organizations

Executive Departments and Agencies: This order directs all executive departments and agencies to terminate current DEI practices that violate civil‐rights laws and enforce merit-based policies.
Department of Labor – Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs: Instructed to immediately cease promoting “diversity” initiatives and the enforcement of affirmative actions in Federal contracting.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB): Tasked with reviewing and revising Government-wide processes, removing references to DEI principles in acquisition, contracting, and grants procedures.
Department of Justice – Attorney General: Required to assist executive agencies in enforcing civil-rights laws and to help formulate strategic recommendations to curb illegal discrimination practices.
Department of Education and State/Local Educational Agencies: Charged, in coordination with the Attorney General, to issue guidance on compliance measures for educational institutions receiving Federal funds and loans.

Relevance Score: 5 (The directive applies across the entire Federal Government, affecting multiple key agencies and departments.)

Responsible Officials

Heads of all Executive Departments and Agencies – Directed to terminate discriminatory policies and enforce longstanding civil‐rights laws across Federal operations.
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (within the Department of Labor) – Tasked with immediately ceasing practices that promote “diversity” initiatives and affirmative action in the Federal contracting process.
Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) – With the assistance of the Attorney General, charged with reviewing and revising Government-wide processes, directives, and guidance to remove DEI references.
Attorney General – Involved in both the review of government processes and the compilation of a strategic enforcement plan, and assisting agency heads in actions directed at the private sector.
Secretary of Education – Jointly responsible with the Attorney General for issuing guidance to State and local educational agencies and Federally-funded institutions regarding compliance with pertinent legal standards.

Relevance Score: 5 (Directives affect top-tier officials including Cabinet members and agency heads, ensuring high-level policy changes.)