President Donald Trump Names Advisory Board Members to the Religious Liberty Commission

Action Summary

  • Establishment of the Commission: On May 1, 2025, an Executive Order was signed to establish the Religious Liberty Commission, with Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick as chair, Dr. Ben Carson as vice chair, and 11 commission members.
  • Designation of Advisory Boards: President Trump designated members to serve on three advisory boards made up respectively of religious leaders, legal experts, and lay advisors.
  • Advisory Board of Religious Leaders: Comprised of prominent figures in faith communities including:
    • Bishop Salvatore Cordileone – Archbishop of San Francisco and active in USCCB committees.
    • Pastor Jentezen Franklin – Senior Pastor of Free Chapel and noted author.
    • Archbishop Elpidophoros of America – Eighth Archbishop, active in the World Council of Churches.
    • Father Thomas Ferguson – Pastor and author focused on Catholic-American political theology.
    • Rabbi Mark Gottlieb – Leader in Jewish education and thought, with extensive academic and community roles.
    • Pastor Jack Graham – Senior Pastor with a record in national prayer initiatives and religious literature.
    • Rabbi Yaakov Menken – Executive VP at the Coalition for Jewish Values and a noted contributor to Orthodox Jewish thought.
    • Bishop Thomas Paprocki – Bishop known for his “Fortnight for Freedom” advocacy and religious liberty engagements.
    • Bishop Kevin Rhoades – Chair of the USCCB Committee on Religious Liberty, also contributing to doctrinal and anti-racism efforts.
    • Rabbi Eitan Webb – Co-founder of Chabad House of Princeton and active campus minister.
    • Rabbi Chaim Dovid Zwiebel – Executive VP of Agudath Israel of America, noted for organizing major Orthodox gatherings.
  • Advisory Board of Legal Experts: Features leading figures in law and constitutional studies including:
    • Francis Beckwith – Professor with expertise in philosophy, church-state studies, and jurisprudence.
    • Jason Bedrick – Research Fellow at The Heritage Foundation focusing on education and religious liberty.
    • Josh Blackman – Constitutional law expert and academic with national recognition.
    • Gerald Bradley – Law professor at the University of Notre Dame with an extensive publication record.
    • Alyza Lewin – President of the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law and experienced litigator.
    • Kristen Waggoner – CEO and general counsel of Alliance Defending Freedom, a key advocate for religious rights.
  • Advisory Board of Lay Leaders: Composed of media professionals, academics, and community activists such as:
    • Abigail Robertson Allen – Veteran reporter and podcast co-host focused on faith-related topics.
    • Gene Bailey – Television host known for discussing current events and spiritual awakenings.
    • Mark David Hall – Regent University professor and author specializing in early American history and faith.
    • Alveda King – Civil rights advocate and leader at the Center for the American Dream.
    • Christopher Levenick – Director at the Connelly Foundation and editor with a focus on civic renewal and religion.
    • Sameerah Munshi – Advocate for opposing radical gender ideology in schools with active legal testimony.
    • Ismail Royer – Director for the Islam and Religious Freedom Action Team, with extensive work promoting interfaith peace.
    • Ryan Tucker – Senior counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom, leading litigation efforts for religious rights.
    • Shaykh Hamza Yusuf – Influential Islamic scholar and co-founder of Zaytuna College, noted for his academic impact in classical learning.

Risks & Considerations

  • The establishment of the Religious Liberty Commission and its advisory boards could lead to increased scrutiny and potential challenges to university policies regarding religious expression and freedom. This may necessitate a review of existing policies to ensure compliance with new federal guidelines.
  • Vanderbilt University may face pressure to align its policies and practices with the principles advocated by the commission, particularly in areas related to religious freedom and expression on campus.
  • The involvement of high-profile religious leaders and legal experts in the commission could influence public discourse and policy-making, potentially impacting the university’s reputation and its relationships with diverse religious communities.
  • There is a risk that the commission’s activities could lead to legal challenges or conflicts with existing university policies, particularly if they are perceived as infringing on religious liberties.

Impacted Programs

  • Office of Religious Life at Vanderbilt may need to engage more actively with the commission’s initiatives to ensure that the university’s policies are in alignment with federal expectations regarding religious freedom.
  • Vanderbilt Law School could see increased demand for expertise in religious liberty law, providing opportunities for research and collaboration with legal experts on the advisory board.
  • The Department of Religious Studies may need to adapt its curriculum to address emerging issues related to religious freedom and expression, potentially collaborating with the commission on educational initiatives.
  • Vanderbilt’s Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion might need to reassess its strategies to ensure that they accommodate the diverse religious perspectives represented by the commission.

Financial Impact

  • The university may need to allocate resources to review and potentially revise its policies and practices related to religious freedom, which could involve legal consultations and administrative adjustments.
  • There could be opportunities for Vanderbilt to secure funding for research and initiatives related to religious liberty, particularly if they align with the commission’s priorities.
  • Potential legal challenges arising from the commission’s activities could result in financial liabilities for the university, necessitating a proactive approach to risk management.
  • Engagement with the commission could enhance Vanderbilt’s reputation as a leader in religious liberty discourse, potentially attracting philanthropic support and partnerships.

Relevance Score: 3 (The establishment of the commission presents moderate risks involving compliance and potential legal challenges.)

Key Actions

  • Vanderbilt’s Office of Religious Life should engage with the newly established Religious Liberty Commission to understand its implications on campus religious activities and policies. This engagement can help ensure that the university’s policies align with federal guidelines while respecting diverse religious practices.
  • The Department of Political Science should conduct research on the impact of the Religious Liberty Commission’s activities on religious freedom and civil rights. This research can provide valuable insights into how these policies affect religious communities and inform the university’s approach to religious diversity and inclusion.
  • Vanderbilt Law School should explore opportunities to collaborate with legal experts on the advisory board to host seminars or workshops on religious liberty and constitutional law. This collaboration can enhance the university’s academic offerings and provide students with a deeper understanding of current legal challenges and opportunities.
  • The Office of Federal Relations should monitor developments related to the Religious Liberty Commission to identify potential funding opportunities or policy changes that could impact the university. By staying informed, the university can proactively address any challenges and capitalize on opportunities that arise.

Opportunities

  • The executive order presents an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Divinity School to expand its research and dialogue on religious liberty and interfaith relations. By leveraging its expertise in theology and religious studies, the Divinity School can contribute to national conversations on religious freedom and diversity.
  • Vanderbilt can capitalize on the increased focus on religious liberty by developing new programs and partnerships with religious institutions. This could include joint research initiatives, student exchange programs, and collaborative curriculum development, enhancing Vanderbilt’s reputation and reach in the field of religious studies.
  • The emphasis on supporting religious freedom offers an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Center for the Study of Religion and Culture to engage in policy analysis and advocacy. By providing evidence-based recommendations, the center can influence how religious liberty policies are implemented and promote religious equity and access.
  • By engaging with the broader religious community and policymakers, Vanderbilt can position itself as a leader in the national conversation on religious liberty. Hosting conferences, workshops, and public forums on the implications of religious freedom policies can further establish Vanderbilt as a hub for innovative religious thought and practice.

Relevance Score: 3 (The order presents some adjustments needed to processes or procedures related to religious activities and policies at Vanderbilt.)

Average Relevance Score: 1.8

Timeline for Implementation

N/A – The directive does not include a specific timeline or enforcement deadline for implementation.

Relevance Score: 1

Impacted Government Organizations

  • Religious Liberty Commission: This newly established executive branch commission, created by a presidential executive order, is directly impacted as it now has structured advisory boards composed of religious leaders, legal experts, and lay leaders to guide its mission.
  • The White House: As the originating body for this directive, the White House plays a central role in the implementation and oversight of the commission’s activities.

Relevance Score: 1 (Only one primary executive commission is directly affected by the executive order directive.)

Responsible Officials

N/A – The text does not outline any directives that require implementation by designated officials; it solely details the appointment of advisory board members to the Religious Liberty Commission.

Relevance Score: 1 (The directive affects advisory appointments without specifying implementation responsibilities.)