SB0536: Require Report on Tuition Waiver Use and Outcomes

TN Gen. Assy Bill: SB0536

Bill Summary

  • Commission Oversight: Mandates an evaluation report from the executive director of the Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
  • Report Submission: The report is to be submitted to the governor and chairs of specified legislative committees.
  • Evaluation Criteria: Focuses on the utilization, state financial support, and student academic outcomes associated with required tuition and fee discounts and waivers at public institutions.

Risks & Considerations

  • The requirement for the Tennessee Higher Education Commission to submit detailed reports on tuition discounts and waivers could lead to increased scrutiny of financial practices at public institutions, including Vanderbilt University. This may necessitate enhanced transparency and accountability in financial reporting.
  • There is a potential risk that the findings of these reports could influence future state funding decisions, possibly leading to changes in financial support for public institutions. This could impact Vanderbilt’s budget planning and financial strategies.
  • The focus on student academic outcomes in relation to financial support might prompt a reevaluation of current tuition discount and waiver policies to ensure they are effectively contributing to student success.
  • Vanderbilt University may need to prepare for potential policy changes that could arise from the legislative review of these reports, which might affect tuition structures and financial aid offerings.

Impacted Programs

  • Vanderbilt’s Financial Aid Office may need to adjust its policies and procedures to align with any new state requirements or recommendations resulting from the commission’s reports.
  • The Office of Institutional Research could play a key role in providing data and analysis to support the university’s response to the commission’s findings and any subsequent policy changes.
  • Vanderbilt’s Administration might need to engage in strategic planning to address potential shifts in state funding priorities and ensure continued financial stability.

Financial Impact

  • The evaluation of state financial support and its impact on student outcomes could lead to changes in how funds are allocated to public institutions, potentially affecting Vanderbilt’s financial planning and resource allocation.
  • Vanderbilt University may need to explore alternative funding sources or adjust its financial strategies to mitigate any negative impacts from changes in state support or tuition policies.
  • There could be opportunities for Vanderbilt to demonstrate the effectiveness of its tuition discount and waiver programs in enhancing student success, potentially influencing positive policy outcomes.

Relevance Score: 3 (The bill presents moderate risks involving compliance and potential changes in financial strategies.)

Key Actions

  • Vanderbilt’s Financial Aid Office should evaluate the implications of the “Speak UP, Tennessee Scholarship Act” which provides scholarships for students demonstrating artistic excellence in spoken word poetry. This could impact the university’s recruitment strategies and financial aid offerings, particularly for students with artistic talents.
  • The Tennessee Higher Education Commission changes, including the addition of the executive director to the selection process for chief executive officers, should be monitored by Vanderbilt’s administration. Understanding these changes will be crucial for aligning the university’s leadership strategies with state policies.
  • Vanderbilt’s Office of Institutional Research should prepare to contribute to the required reports on tuition discounts and waivers. This will involve evaluating the utilization, state financial support, and student academic outcomes, which could influence future tuition policies and financial planning.

Opportunities

  • The introduction of the “Speak UP, Tennessee Scholarship Act” offers an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Department of English and Creative Writing to engage with high school students excelling in spoken word poetry. This could lead to partnerships and outreach programs that enhance the university’s visibility and attract talented students.
  • The expanded authority of the Tennessee Higher Education Commission’s executive director presents an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Leadership to engage more directly with state education policymakers. This could facilitate better alignment of the university’s strategic goals with state educational priorities.
  • By participating in the evaluation of tuition discounts and waivers, Vanderbilt can position itself as a leader in advocating for equitable access to higher education. This involvement could enhance the university’s reputation and influence in shaping state education policies.

Relevance Score: 3 (Some adjustments are needed to processes or procedures due to changes in scholarship opportunities and state education commission policies.)

Average Relevance Score: 2.6

Timeline for Implementation

N/A – The directive does not specify any timeline or deadline for the submission of the report.

Relevance Score: 1

Impacted Government Organizations

  • Tennessee Higher Education Commission: Directly mandated to prepare and submit the report evaluating the utilization of discounts and waivers, state financial support, and student academic outcomes at public institutions.
  • Office of the Governor: Receives the report from the commission, providing the executive oversight necessary to align state higher education policies.
  • Legislative Committees: The chairs of certain legislative committees are designated as report recipients to inform legislative oversight of higher education funding and student outcomes.

Relevance Score: 2 (A small number of 3 agencies are directly impacted by this legislation.)

Responsible Officials

  • Executive Director, Tennessee Higher Education Commission – Responsible for preparing and submitting the evaluation report on tuition discounts, state financial support, and student academic outcomes to the governor and legislative committee chairs.

Relevance Score: 4 (The directive significantly impacts an agency head.)