Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Rescinds Additional Harmful Biden Executive Actions
March 14, 2025
Action Summary
- Rescinding Harmful Actions: President Trump signed an Executive Order rescinding 19 additional executive actions from the Biden administration, building on nearly 80 rescinded on Day One.
- Policy Reversal Objective: The rescissions aim to end radical ideology, eliminate wasteful regulations, and prioritize American citizen interests.
- Comparative Impact: In two months, more Biden-era executive actions have been rescinded than the total number of executive orders issued by Biden in his first year.
- Targeted Biden Policies:
- Gender Ideology: Rescinding actions that promoted radical gender ideology in U.S. diplomacy and foreign aid.
- Defense Production Act Use: Eliminating the use of the Act for advancing the “Green New Scam,” including mandates for electric heat pumps and solar panels.
- Land and Energy Proclamations: Terminating proclamations that designated nearly a million acres as national monuments, restricting economic development and energy production.
- Labor and Union Policies: Repealing orders enforcing radical labor policies, apprenticeship mandates, and union-driven regulations on businesses and government agencies.
- Federal Resource Allocation: Revoking directives that channeled Federal resources into biotech and biomanufacturing initiatives under environmental pretenses.
- Commitment to Action: President Trump vows to continue reviewing and repealing additional Biden policies to restore what he terms a new golden age of prosperity, security, and strength for America.
Risks & Considerations
- The rescission of executive actions related to environmental policies, such as the use of the Defense Production Act for green initiatives, could impact Vanderbilt University’s sustainability programs and research initiatives. This may lead to reduced federal support for projects focused on renewable energy and environmental conservation.
- The removal of policies related to gender ideology and labor regulations may affect the university’s diversity and inclusion efforts, as well as its partnerships with industries that prioritize union-driven policies.
- The termination of proclamations regarding national monuments could influence research and educational opportunities related to environmental science and conservation, potentially limiting field study locations and funding.
- Changes in federal support for biotech and biomanufacturing initiatives may impact Vanderbilt’s research funding and collaborations in these fields, necessitating adjustments in strategic planning and resource allocation.
- Vanderbilt University may need to reassess its compliance and regulatory strategies in response to shifts in federal policies, particularly those affecting labor and environmental standards.
Impacted Programs
- Vanderbilt Institute for Energy and Environment may face challenges in securing federal funding for sustainability projects, requiring a shift towards alternative funding sources or partnerships.
- Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion might need to adapt its strategies to align with changing federal policies on gender and labor, ensuring continued support for diverse and inclusive practices.
- Vanderbilt’s Research Centers focused on biotech and biomanufacturing may need to explore new collaborations and funding opportunities to offset potential reductions in federal support.
- The School of Engineering could be affected by changes in federal priorities for green technology and innovation, impacting research directions and industry partnerships.
Financial Impact
- Potential reductions in federal funding for environmental and biotech initiatives could necessitate a reevaluation of Vanderbilt’s research funding strategies and priorities.
- Changes in labor and regulatory policies may influence the university’s operational costs and compliance expenditures, requiring adjustments in budget planning and resource allocation.
- Vanderbilt may need to increase efforts to secure private or state funding to support programs and initiatives affected by federal policy changes.
- The university’s ability to attract and retain diverse talent could be impacted by shifts in federal policies on gender and labor, influencing recruitment and retention strategies.
Relevance Score: 4 (The order presents a need for potential major changes or transformations of programs.)
Key Actions
- Vanderbilt’s Office of Federal Relations should closely monitor changes in federal policies, especially those related to environmental and labor regulations, to assess their impact on university operations and research funding. Engaging with policymakers to understand the implications of these rescissions can help Vanderbilt adapt its strategies accordingly.
- The Vanderbilt Institute for Energy and Environment should evaluate the potential effects of rescinding mandates for electric heat pumps and solar panels on its research initiatives. This may involve adjusting research priorities or seeking alternative funding sources to continue projects aligned with sustainable energy goals.
- Vanderbilt’s School of Engineering should explore opportunities to innovate in biomanufacturing and biotechnology, as federal support for these areas may be reduced. By leveraging its expertise, the school can position itself to attract private sector partnerships and funding.
- The Department of Political Science should conduct research on the broader societal impacts of reversing labor and environmental policies. This research can provide valuable insights into how these changes affect economic development and regulatory landscapes, enhancing Vanderbilt’s role as a thought leader in policy analysis.
Opportunities
- The executive order presents an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Peabody College to expand its research on the impacts of rescinded educational and labor policies. By analyzing these changes, Peabody can contribute to the national conversation on education and workforce development.
- Vanderbilt can capitalize on the focus on reducing federal regulations by developing new programs and partnerships that align with state and local government priorities. This could include joint research initiatives and collaborative projects that address regional needs and challenges.
- The emphasis on reversing environmental policies offers an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Center for Environmental Management Studies to engage in policy analysis and advocacy. By providing evidence-based recommendations, the center can influence how these policy changes are implemented and their impact on environmental sustainability.
Relevance Score: 3 (Some adjustments are needed to processes or procedures due to changes in federal policies affecting research and regulatory compliance.)
Timeline for Implementation
- Effective on Day One of President Trump’s term – Immediate implementation.
Relevance Score: 5
Impacted Government Organizations
- White House: As the source of the Executive Order, it is central to setting and reversing policy directives that affect multiple governmental functions.
- Department of State: The rescission of Biden’s executive action affecting U.S. diplomacy and foreign aid directly impacts the State Department’s operations and policy execution.
- Department of the Interior: The termination of proclamations designating new national monuments implicates agencies managing public lands, including the Interior Department’s bureaus.
- Department of Labor: Repealing executive orders related to labor policies and apprenticeship mandates affects regulatory standards and workforce initiatives overseen by the Labor Department.
- Department of Commerce: The elimination of executive actions utilizing the Defense Production Act influences industrial production and energy policies, areas in which Commerce plays a crucial role.
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): The revocation of directives channeling federal resources toward biotech and biomanufacturing under environmental policy impacts the EPA’s regulatory and funding priorities.
Relevance Score: 3 (Directives affect 6 key agencies across varied policy areas.)
Responsible Officials
- N/A – The text does not specify any responsible officials or departments for implementing the rescission directives.
Relevance Score: 1 (No specific implementation directives or affected officials are identified.)