Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Honors Jocelyn Nungaray

March 4, 2025

Fact Sheets

View Original

Action Summary

Honoring Jocelyn Nungaray: Renaming of the Anahuac National Wildlife Refuge to the “Jocelyn Nungaray National Refuge” in remembrance of a twelve‐year‐old victim whose tragic death is highlighted as a symbol of lost American innocence.
Details of the Incident: Jocelyn Nungaray was murdered in Houston, Texas by two individuals identified as Venezuelan illegal aliens with alleged gang ties, underscoring the incident’s political and social ramifications.
Critique of Previous Administration: The fact sheet strongly criticizes the Biden Administration’s immigration policies, claiming they led to widespread criminal activity and insecurity at the southern border.
Border Crisis Impact: Emphasis on the perceived consequences of lenient border policies, including increased criminal arrests, human trafficking, and other violent crimes tied to illegal immigration.
Border Security Achievements Under President Trump:
- National Emergency Declaration: Initiation of emergency measures to secure the southern border.
- Deployment of Additional Personnel: Inclusion of Armed Forces and National Guard members at the border.
- Restart of Border Wall Construction: A renewed commitment to physically secure the border.
- Designation of Criminal Organizations: Labeling groups such as MS-13 and Tren de Aragua as Foreign Terrorist Organizations.
- Immigration Policy Changes: Suspension of illegal entry, enhanced vetting protocols, resumption of the Migrant Protection Protocols, termination of catch-and-release, and other measures aimed at reversing previous policies.
Policy Outcomes: Reported dramatic improvements including record low apprehensions at the southern border and significant increases in arrests of illegal immigrants, suggesting enhanced national security.

Risks & Considerations

The Executive Order’s focus on stringent immigration policies and border security could impact Vanderbilt University’s international student population, particularly those from countries affected by the enhanced vetting and screening processes.
There is a potential risk of decreased diversity within the student body, as the suspension of certain immigration programs and the end of automatic citizenship for children of illegal aliens may reduce the number of international applicants.
The termination of categorical parole programs and the pause of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) could affect students and faculty involved in research or initiatives related to immigration, human rights, and refugee support.
Vanderbilt may need to reassess its support systems and resources for international students and scholars, ensuring compliance with new immigration regulations and addressing any challenges they may face.

Impacted Programs

Vanderbilt’s International Student and Scholar Services (ISSS) will likely need to increase its efforts to support affected students and scholars, providing guidance on navigating the new immigration landscape.
The Department of Political Science and Law School may see increased interest in courses and research related to immigration policy, international law, and human rights.
Vanderbilt’s Office of Diversity and Inclusion might need to develop strategies to maintain campus diversity and inclusivity in light of potential changes in the international student demographic.
Programs focused on Latin American studies and partnerships with institutions in affected countries may need to be reevaluated to ensure alignment with the new policies.

Financial Impact

The potential decrease in international student enrollment could impact tuition revenue, as international students often pay higher tuition rates than domestic students.
Vanderbilt may need to allocate additional resources to support services for international students, including legal assistance and counseling, to help them adapt to the new immigration policies.
Research funding opportunities related to immigration and border security may increase, providing potential avenues for Vanderbilt to secure grants and collaborate with federal agencies.
The university might experience changes in its funding landscape if federal grants prioritize research and initiatives aligned with the administration’s immigration agenda.

Relevance Score: 4 (The order presents a need for potential major changes or transformations of programs.)

Key Actions

Vanderbilt’s Office of Federal Relations should closely monitor changes in immigration policies, particularly those affecting international students and scholars. This will be crucial in understanding how these changes might impact the university’s ability to attract and retain international talent.
The Vanderbilt University Law School should consider expanding its research and advocacy efforts related to immigration law and policy. By engaging in policy analysis and providing legal expertise, the law school can contribute to the national conversation on immigration reform and its implications for higher education.
Vanderbilt’s International Student and Scholar Services should assess the potential impact of enhanced vetting and screening processes on current and prospective international students. Developing strategies to support affected students will be essential for maintaining a diverse and inclusive campus community.
The Department of Political Science should conduct research on the broader societal impacts of the administration’s immigration policies. This research can provide valuable insights into how these policies affect community dynamics and long-term economic outcomes.

Opportunities

The executive order presents an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Peabody College to engage in research on the effects of immigration policies on educational access and equity. By leveraging its expertise in education policy, Peabody can contribute to the design and evaluation of programs that support immigrant and refugee students.
Vanderbilt can capitalize on the increased focus on border security by developing partnerships with government agencies and non-profit organizations working on immigration issues. This could include joint research initiatives, policy analysis, and community outreach programs.
The emphasis on national security and immigration control offers an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Center for International Studies to engage in policy analysis and advocacy. By providing evidence-based recommendations, the center can influence how these policies are implemented and their impact on international relations.

Relevance Score: 4 (The order presents the potential for major process changes required for Vanderbilt’s programs due to impacts on international students and immigration policies.)

Average Relevance Score: 3.4

Timeline for Implementation

N/A – The directive does not specify any explicit dates or deadlines; actions described, such as “on Day One” or “as soon as practicable,” are either retrospective or unspecific, thus no clear numeric timeline is provided.

Relevance Score: 1

Impacted Government Organizations

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Department of the Interior): Renaming the Anahuac National Wildlife Refuge impacts this agency, which is responsible for managing the nation’s wildlife refuges.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP): Actions such as ending the use of the CBP One app, along with heightened border security measures, directly affect CBP operations.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): Increased enforcement and arrests at the southern border, as highlighted by the surge in ICE activities, implicate ICE.
U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) – Department of State: The pausing of USRAP operations directly impacts this program managed by the State Department.
Department of Defense / U.S. Armed Forces: The deployment of the Armed Forces and the detention of individuals at Guantanamo Bay involve the Department of Defense.
National Guard: The mobilization of National Guard units for border security also marks a direct impact on this organization.

Relevance Score: 3 (Multiple Federal Agencies, numbering six, are directly impacted by the executive action.)

Responsible Officials

President Donald J. Trump – Signed the Executive Order and provided overall strategic direction for the renaming of the refuge and the comprehensive border security measures.
Secretary of Homeland Security – Tasked with executing directives related to border security, immigration enforcement, termination of previous policies, and resumption of the Migrant Protection Protocols.
Secretary of Defense – Responsible for the deployment of Armed Forces and National Guard personnel to secure the southern border and support the administration’s security initiatives.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) – Expected to implement operational measures such as ending the use of the CBP One app, ramping up apprehensions at the border, and enforcing new immigration protocols.

Relevance Score: 5 (The directives directly affect White House decisions and Cabinet-level officials responsible for nationwide security and policy enforcement.)