National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-2

February 4, 2025

Presidential Actions

View Original

Action Summary

Objective: Impose maximum pressure on Iran to deny it a nuclear weapon, curb its missile program, neutralize its regional aggression, and disrupt its support for terrorist organizations.
National Security Concerns:
- Iran’s longstanding hostility toward the U.S. and its allies.
- Direct involvement in terror through proxies such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and others.
- Evidenced role in targeting U.S. citizens, sponsoring cyber attacks, and embedding sleeper cells.
- Accusations of human rights abuses and arbitrary detentions, including against U.S. citizens.
Iran’s Nuclear and Missile Threat:
- Iran’s efforts to develop nuclear capabilities and missile systems are seen as an existential threat.
- Failure to comply with Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty obligations and concealment of nuclear material and sites.
Directed Actions for Key Agencies:
- Treasury: Impose and enforce comprehensive sanctions, ensure financial restrictions, and block revenue sources for Iran and its proxies.
- State Department: Modify or rescind sanctions waivers, spearhead diplomatic isolation, and work to reduce Iran’s oil exports to zero.
- United Nations: Coordinate with allies to snap back international sanctions and hold Iran accountable for its treaty breaches.
- Commerce: Enforce export controls to restrict military-related technology transfers to Iran.
- Attorney General: Use legal tools to investigate and dismantle financial and logistical networks supporting Iranian terrorism, prosecute related offenses, and counter espionage and sanctions evasion efforts.
General Provisions:
- Actions remain subject to applicable law, available appropriations, and do not confer enforceable rights on any party.
- Agencies’ authority and ongoing operations are not impaired by this memorandum.

Risks & Considerations

The Executive Order’s focus on imposing maximum pressure on Iran could lead to heightened geopolitical tensions, which may impact international collaborations and partnerships that Vanderbilt University is involved in, particularly those related to Middle Eastern studies or international relations.
Sanctions and restrictions on Iran could affect students and faculty from Iran or those with ties to the region, potentially leading to challenges in admissions, visas, and international travel for academic purposes.
The emphasis on cybersecurity and countering espionage may necessitate increased vigilance and investment in cybersecurity measures at Vanderbilt University to protect sensitive research and data from potential threats.
Vanderbilt’s programs related to international law, human rights, and diplomacy may need to adapt their curricula to address the evolving legal and diplomatic landscape resulting from these policies.

Impacted Programs

Vanderbilt’s Center for International Studies may need to reassess its research focus and partnerships in light of the increased geopolitical tensions and sanctions against Iran.
The Office of International Student and Scholar Services might experience an increase in demand for support services for Iranian students and scholars affected by the new policies.
Vanderbilt’s Law School could see increased interest in courses related to international law, sanctions, and human rights, providing opportunities for expanded course offerings and research initiatives.
The Department of Political Science may find opportunities to engage in research and discussions on the implications of U.S. foreign policy and its impact on global security and diplomacy.

Financial Impact

The sanctions and economic measures against Iran could indirectly affect funding opportunities for research projects related to international relations and Middle Eastern studies, necessitating adjustments in grant application strategies.
Vanderbilt University may need to allocate additional resources to enhance cybersecurity infrastructure and training to mitigate potential threats arising from increased geopolitical tensions.
There may be opportunities for Vanderbilt to secure funding for research on cybersecurity, international law, and diplomacy, particularly in collaboration with federal agencies and think tanks focused on national security.
The potential impact on international student enrollment from Iran could affect tuition revenue and necessitate adjustments in financial aid and scholarship distribution.

Relevance Score: 4 (The order presents a need for potential major changes or transformations of programs and increased security measures.)

Key Actions

Vanderbilt’s International Relations Department should monitor developments in U.S. foreign policy towards Iran, particularly regarding sanctions and diplomatic efforts. This will be crucial for understanding the geopolitical landscape and its potential impact on international students and collaborations.
The Office of Federal Relations should engage with policymakers to understand the implications of sanctions on academic exchanges and research collaborations with Iranian institutions. This proactive approach will help mitigate risks associated with potential disruptions in international partnerships.
Vanderbilt’s Legal Department should review compliance with U.S. sanctions laws to ensure that the university’s activities, including research and financial transactions, do not inadvertently violate these regulations. This will help avoid legal and financial repercussions.
The Center for Middle East Studies should conduct research on the broader implications of U.S. policies towards Iran, including the impact on regional stability and international relations. Sharing these insights with the academic community and policymakers can enhance Vanderbilt’s role as a thought leader in international affairs.

Opportunities

The executive order presents an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Political Science Department to expand its research on the effects of sanctions and international diplomacy. By leveraging its expertise, the department can contribute to the understanding of global security dynamics and policy effectiveness.
Vanderbilt can capitalize on the increased focus on cybersecurity and counterintelligence by developing new programs and partnerships with government agencies. This could include joint research initiatives, student internships, and collaborative projects, enhancing Vanderbilt’s reputation in the field of national security.
The emphasis on countering foreign malign influence offers an opportunity for Vanderbilt’s Center for Technology and Information Policy to engage in policy analysis and advocacy. By providing evidence-based recommendations, the center can influence how these issues are addressed at the national level.

Relevance Score: 3 (The order requires some adjustments to processes or procedures, particularly in compliance and international relations.)

Average Relevance Score: 4.4

Timeline for Implementation

Immediate: Several sections, including directives for the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of State, require actions to be taken immediately.

Relevance Score: 5

Impacted Government Organizations

Secretary of State: Directed to modify sanctions waivers and lead a diplomatic campaign to isolate Iran through international forums and organizations.
Secretary of the Treasury: Tasked with imposing and enforcing sanctions, blocking financial channels, and ensuring that Iran is denied revenue.
Secretary of Defense: Listed as a recipient of the memorandum, highlighting the role of defense in national security though specific directives are not detailed in the text.
Attorney General: Instructed to investigate and prosecute networks and actors that support Iranian terror proxies and disrupt illicit financial and logistical operations.
Secretary of Energy: Named for potential engagement with issues surrounding nuclear weapons development and Iran’s nuclear program.
Secretary of the Interior: Included in the header, indicating involvement in aspects that might overlap with national resources or domestic security measures.
Secretary of Homeland Security: Involved in safeguarding the homeland from Iranian proxy activities and potential terrorist threats.
Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff: Part of the leadership team tasked with overseeing the integration and execution of these national security directives.
United States Trade Representative: Expected to participate in trade and sanctions efforts that limit Iran’s economic opportunities.
United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations: Charged with working internationally to restore sanctions and highlight Iran’s violations to global bodies.
Director of National Intelligence: Tasked indirectly with providing intelligence to support the enforcement of sanctions and national security efforts.
Director of the Central Intelligence Agency: Also implicated in intelligence gathering and analysis relevant to Iran’s activities.
Director of the Office of Management and Budget: Involved in ensuring that appropriate budgetary resources are allocated consistent with these directives.
Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs: Advises on national security strategy and coordinates interagency efforts.
Counsel to the President: Provides legal counsel on the implementation of these extensive directives.
Assistant to the President for Economic Policy: Advises on economic measures, including sanctions, to further isolate Iran financially.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: Responsible for integrating military strategy with broader national security policies as outlined.
Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation: Charged with investigating internal networks, financial crimes, and domestic threats linked to Iran.
Secretary of Commerce: Directed to enforce export controls and restrict the flow of technology that could bolster Iran’s military capabilities.

Relevance Score: 5 (A broad and comprehensive directive impacting numerous key federal agencies and spanning multiple areas of national security, economic policy, and intelligence.)

Responsible Officials

Secretary of the Treasury – Responsible for imposing sanctions, enforcing compliance against Iran-related activities, reviewing and modifying regulatory guidance, and maintaining countermeasures to deny illicit revenue.
Secretary of State – Tasked with modifying or rescinding sanctions waivers, leading a diplomatic campaign to isolate Iran, and coordinating with other agencies to prevent sanctions evasion.
United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations – Charged with working with international allies to enforce snapback sanctions, holding Iran accountable for treaty breaches, and convening Security Council meetings on Iran’s threats.
Secretary of Commerce – Directed to conduct a robust export control enforcement campaign to restrict technology flows that could enhance Iran’s military capabilities.
Attorney General – Assigned to investigate, disrupt, and prosecute financial, logistical, and legal networks supporting Iranian state and proxy activities, and to leverage legal methods to counter Iran’s actions.

Relevance Score: 5 (Directs Cabinet-level officials and significant agency heads in a comprehensive national security initiative against Iran.)